Want to learn
something truly amazing? Then read on. This is a story that is just dying to be
told and it proves how sometimes even supposed experts can get things totally
wrong.
We owe a great deal
to the Sumerians. This culture, which flourished in what today is Iraq, goes
back to well before 3,000 BC. The Sumerians gave us writing and created the
method of time keeping we still use today. In addition they invented the wheel,
influenced agriculture, built the first city states and left behind a wealth of
invaluable evidence.
Very early in their
history the Sumerians began to live a settled life, based on farming. This led
to great settlements, where specialists could flourish and where trade was an
essential part of life. Society works best when everyone involved is singing
from the same hymn sheet, especially when it comes to buying and selling in the
market place. For this reason the Sumerians soon developed a good way of
dealing with measurements of all kinds. As history progressed, and the Sumerian
civilization eventually gave way to that of the Babylonians, the Sumerian
measuring systems became fiercely complicated and were often different from
city to city. But that’s not the way things started because if we peel back the
layers of history we can see that, quite early in its history, the Sumerian
measuring system was simple, consistent and covered everything necessary for a
settled life.
Any measuring
system that is really good is integrated. That means that various aspects of it
relate to all the others. In the metric system for example, there is a basic
unit of length, the metre, and all the other measurements derive from this. A
cube with sides 1/10th of a metre in length holds a specific amount
of water. In terms of volume, this is called a litre, and the weight of the
water is called a kilogram. Things never alter and everyone knows where they
are. However, the metric system was only created at the end of the 18th
century, and is based on the size of the Earth, whereas the Sumerian system is
truly ancient, so of course it must be much more primitive than the metric
system – or is it?
Measuring Length
Like in the metric
system the Sumerians started out with a basic unit of length. This was called
the kush. We know how long the kush was because one of the Sumerian kings,
Gudea, left us statues of himself, on which a kush measure is recreated. Since
there is more than one statue, and the lengths agree, we can take it that the
measures were carefully made – so carefully in fact that we can easily see that
the kush was 49.94 cm in length. It’s important to realise from the start that
the Sumerians dealt just as often in ‘double’ units, as they did in single
ones, so the double kush, at 99.88 cm was just as important as the single kush.
In fact, as we will see, it is very likely that the double kush actually was
the true unit of length first used by the Sumerians.
Statue of Gudea,
with tablet and measuring rod circa 2144 – 2124 BC
Measuring Volume
The Sumerian’s
basic unit of volume was called the Sila. This too appeared in half and double
forms. But this is where the controversy starts. It is quite obvious to anyone
with half a brain that the Sila was derived by way of a cube, with sides of
1/10th of a double kush – just the same way the litre is derived
from the metre. Experts do not agree, and have come up with all sorts of
tortured explanations as to what the Sila really is. I’ve described their
arguments as being akin to the person who said the plays of Shakespeare were
not written by William Shakespeare at all, but by another man of the same name!
Examples of Sila
vessels show that the volume of the Sila was equivalent to around 0.996 litres.
Measuring Weight
The Sumerian unit
of weight was called a Mina. No matter what the experts say, it is equivalent
to the weight of water in ½ a Sila, which turns out to be 0.498 kilograms. Once
again, the double Mina was often used, which would have weighed 0.996
kilograms.
And there we have
it – a simple and efficient way to measure anything. There were subdivisions and
multiples for all these units and they used the base 60 counting system that
the Sumerians invented. But that certainly isn’t the end of the story, because
in order to have an efficient measuring system, it’s important to be able to
verify it whenever is necessary, otherwise people will start to cheat and give
short weight or length. The way this was achieved in comparatively recent times
was to produce ‘sample’ measures, that were incredibly carefully made, and
which could be used to verify the weights and measures being used in the market
place. Sumer was a mainly Bronze Age culture, so they did have metal and could
have made sample measures, but how did they arrive at their units in the first
place? This is where the experts really get their knickers in a knot because although
they have all read what the Sumerians say on the matter – they don’t believe
it. Why they think the Sumerians are lying is a complete mystery to me.
Arriving at the Measurements
Clay tablets left
to us by the Sumerians are quite specific. They say that the unit of length,
the kush, was equal to 180 barley seeds. “Oh no,” say the experts. “That can’t
be correct.” I’ve searched everywhere to find out why these people don’t
believe the Sumerian scribes and I can only assume that they have been looking
at our own experiences in the West. In Europe, both barley seeds and wheat
seeds were once used as basic units of measure. However, quite quickly these
became simply standards. In other words, the weights and measures eventually
had nothing whatsoever to do with seeds any more, and they altered considerably
in size. Those who have studied the Sumerian culture assume that the same was
true, and that to the Sumerians the term ‘barley seed’ actually meant something
artificial and had nothing to do with the plant at all.
If any of the
modern experts actually tried to make a kush out of barley seeds, they probably
laid the seeds end to end, as the Europeans originally did. If so, there’s no
wonder they thought the Sumerians were not talking about real barley seeds.
What they obviously never tried to do was to lay the seeds on their sides,
front to back. If they had done this, they would have discovered that even 180
modern barley seeds does indeed measure an incredibly accurate 49.94 cm and the
360 barley seeds of the double kush is a reliable 99.88 cm. (Of course this
varies slightly from experiment to experiment but 99.88 cm is a reliable
average and each experiment is incredibly similar.)
A barley cubit or kush,
comprised of 180 barley seeds.
Volume, Weight and Barley Seeds.
So far so good and.
I can say, hand on heart, that the experts who state the Sumerians did not use
real barley seeds to set their unit of length are downright wrong. If they
doubt what I am saying, they should try it for themselves, or they could simply
look at the picture above..
But the Sumerians
did not stop with length. They quite clearly said in their clay tablets that
the weight of the mina was equal to the weight of 10,800 barley grains. We’ve
already established that the double mina, if created from a cube with sides
1/10th of a kush in length, would hold a weight of water equivalent
to 0.996 kilograms. There would be twice as many barley seeds in this case,
bringing us to 21,600 barley seeds. That means each barley seed should weigh
0.046 grams. The experts obviously chose not to get out a pair of scales and
check this, but we did. We used organic barley, supplied to us by a friendly
farmer and we discovered that, on average, our barley seeds weighed 0.0465
grams. We also looked up other figures and discovered that the average weight
of barley seeds from the 1979 British crop was 0.045 grams.
There is nothing
ambiguous about this. Between our own barley seeds and those from the 1979
crop, the average weight of a barley seed was 0.04575 grams – as near to 0.046
grams as makes no difference, especially bearing in mind that the Sumerians
were growing their barley 5,000 years ago.
So Far, So Good
It all works out
perfectly well. We can take it as read that the Sumerians based their whole
system of weights and measures on the size and weight of barley seeds. It
doesn’t matter what the experts say to the contrary because the system works.
Anything they choose to do to muddy the water is a total waste of time and is
irrelevant.
So why won’t they
accept that this is what the Sumerians did? Well I suspect it’s all a matter of
embarrassment. The trouble is that the universal measuring system used in the
world today is the metric system. It was devised by the scientists of the
French Academy of Sciences in the heady days of Revolution in France at the end
of the 18th century. They based the system on the polar
circumference of the Earth. Establishing a measurement between the North Pole
and the Equator, they split this length into 10,000,000 units, each of which
they called a metre. They said that 1,000 metres would equal a kilometre, and because
they then had to multiply by 4, it turned out that the Earth had a polar
circumference of 40,000 kilometres.
As I’ve already
pointed out, they devised the units of weight and volume from a cube with sides
of 1/10th of a metre. (actually they used the centimetre but it
amounts to the same thing). All that mattered was that the system worked, could
be universal and could always be re-checked.
At the time,
nothing at all was known about the Sumerians. It wasn’t until a century or more
after the 18th century that Sumerian baked clay writing tablets
began to be found in Iraq. Imagine the consternation of the mostly French
archaeologists, once they could read the tablets, to discover that the metric
system of measurements was not new in the late 18th century – it was
as good as 5,000 years old! They couldn’t take it then and they can’t take it
now. However, it’s a fact, that to an incredible degree of accuracy, the metric
system of measurements was first used by the Sumerians. The only difference is
that the Sumerians used a base 60 number system for smaller and larger units and
not a base 10 one as we use these days. And in a way that is better because
although everything in the metric system is base 10, we still measure time in
base 60.
Now it Gets Really Weird
If you don’t want
to be really, really shocked, look away now. It has always surprised me that,
entirely by chance and using the metric system, the mass of the Earth on which
we live is quoted as being 5.976 X 10 24 kilograms. Just in case you
are unfamiliar with numbers ‘to the power of’ this number could be viewed as
597,600,000,000,000,000,000,000 kilograms. This is so close to a satisfying and
very round 600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 kilograms that I’m surprised nobody
has pointed the fact out. By then why should they? The kilogram is simply a
convenient weight that people can use. It doesn’t have any physical reality,
except the one we place upon it. All the same, it’s a weird coincidence because
the Earth’s mass is correct to 600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 kilograms to
around 99.94%. However, the Sumerian double mana is slightly less heavy than
the kilogram. In fact, if we turn kilograms into double mana, the Earth has a
mass of 600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 double mana!
Could this possibly
be a coincidence? All I can say is that it’s more likely for you look out of
your bedroom window tomorrow morning and see a pink elephant standing on the
lawn – even if you haven’t had a drink for months, than it is for this result to
be a random chance event. This is particularly true when we bear in mind that
the whole Sumerian system is classified as being a partly base 60 (sexagesimal)
and partly base 10 system
What this
ultimately means is that the total mass of the Earth is equal to
12,960,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 barley seeds. If we were to segment the
Earth, like an orange, each 1° segment would be equal to
36,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 barley seeds, each 1’ segment would be equal
to 600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 barley seeds and every 1” segment of the
Earth would be equal to 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 barley seeds.
The Implications
I hardly dare to
consider the implications of all this. I have altered no numbers and everything
here in terms of length is based on a kush of 49.94 cm, which is what the
measures on the Gudea statues tell us it was, which is confirmed by the barley
seed experiments. As far as weight is concerned, I have followed what the
Sumerians said they did, and measured barley seeds to verify the results. Since
the weights turned out correct and mesh with what the Sumerians stated, how can
be doubt the evidence of our own eyes?
So was the Sumerian
weight (mass) measurement based ultimately on the mass of the Earth? If it was,
they were very, very bright and got extremely lucky with regard to the weight
of a barley seed. On the other hand, we know very little about the evolution of
domesticated barley, which could have been genetically engineered or
selectively bred to offer the right results.
Whatever the answer
this all goes to prove that we can’t always listen to the experts. So often
particular scientific endeavours turn into something akin to a religion, which
have far more to do with ‘belief’ then they do with empirical research.
You can join me on:
Hiya Alan, I want to talk to you about this research, I am also in the UK in bedfordshire. I did look for you on facebook but could not find you. My email is lisa.keane@hotmail.com Lisa
ReplyDeleteAlan Butler: Before The Pyramids - Cracking Archaeology's Greatest Mystery.
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry, I do not know English, that's why I use a Google translator.
46656000=360^3=5,4*1000*8640
(4665,6 * 6800)/86400=367,2
(January 3, 4 h , 48 m)
367,5(perihelium)-367,2=0,3
0,3*86400=25920
25920*1200=31104000
31104000 / 466,56=66666,66666666667
(66666,66666666667 / 86400)*24=18,51851851851852
360*1,.008=362,88 (perihelium)
31104000 *1,008=31352832
31352832/360=31352832
31352832/86400=362,88 (perihelium)
86400 / 24 * 18,618=67024,8
67500-67024,8=475,2
475,2/60=7,92
7,92*100(unit of measure)=729
792*12,5=9900
792-2522=1730
Phases of the Moon:-792 http://astropixels.com/ephemeris/phasescat/phases-0799.html
Phases of the Moon: 1731 to 1735 http://astropixels.com/ephemeris/phasescat/phases1701.html
14 Nisan -729 (b.c.e)=April 4 (Passover)
14 Nisan 1730 (Passover )= April 3 (Passover)
729(b.c.e)+2018=2810
(2810*12,5)-9900=25225
(25225/10)-2522=5
5*792=3960
8*792=6336
(6336*6300 ; radius of the Earth)/252000(the circumference of the Earth)=158,4
252000(the circumference of the earth)*158,4m=252000(the circumference of the earth)=39916800 m
39916800/1000(unit of measure)=39916,8 (http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1152111,1171251)
Measures and volumes, yields
ReplyDeleteLet's start with ... the field's surface area.
The best shape to measure the field surface is ... triangle(Heron's formula)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heron%27s_formula
Difficulties can also be estimated by the weight of a given product based on its volume.
Type of product / material:Wheat
The average mass of 1 m3 in kg-750-800
Average volume 1 t in m3- 1,33-1,25
Type of product / material:Rye
The average mass of 1 m3 in kg= 650-750
Average volume 1 t in m3=1,54-1,33
Type of product / material:Barley***
The average mass of 1 m3 in kg= 600-640***
Average volume 1 t in m3=1,67-1,56
***GRAIN GEOMETRIC FEATURES
The shape of barley and oat grain can be roughly compared to the shape of the ellipsoid control.In astronomy and the construction of the calendar , apse points to the extreme points of the elliptical orbit.
Perihelium =367,5 days(January 3)
Aphelion= July 3
Emmer wheat or hulled wheat is a type of awned wheat. Emmer is a tetraploid (2n = 4x = 28 chromosomes). The domesticated types are Triticum turgidum subsp. dicoccum and Triticum turgidum conv. durum. The wild plant is called Triticum turgidum subsp. dicoccoides. The principal difference between the wild and the domestic is that the ripened seed head of the wild plant shatters and scatters the seed onto the ground, while in the domesticated emmer the seed head remains intact, thus making it easier for humans to harvest the grain.
The location of the earliest site of emmer domestication is still unclear and under debate.[10] Some of the earliest sites with possible indirect evidence for emmer domestication during the Early Pre-Pottery Neolithic B include Tell Aswad, Çayönü, Cafer Höyük, Aşıklı Höyük, Kissonerga-Mylouthkia [de] and Shillourokambos. Definitive evidence for the full domestication of emmer wheat is not found until the Middle Pre-Pottery Neolithic , at sites such as Beidha, Tell Ghoraifé, Jericho, Abu Hureyra, Tell Halula, Tell Aswad and Cafer Höyük.
____________________________________________
Jerusalem coordinates: 31°47′N 35°13′E
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerusalem)
31783333 / 360=88287,03611111111
88287,03611111111-88200=87,03611111111
8,703611111111 * 60=522,21666666666
522,21666666666 - 522=0,21666666666
0,21666666666*378=81,89999999748
81,89999999748*4,5=368,54999998866
368,54999998866 * 1,6=589,679999981856
368,54999998866 / 1,008=365,625***
see lunar eclipse that took place in 523 B.C.E (http://astropixels.com/ephemeris/phasescat/phases-0599.html )
14 Nisan 523 b.c.e=marc 31
523-2522=1999(http://astropixels.com/ephemeris/phasescat/phases1901.html)
-523-84=-607 August 9/10(between two evenings) the destruction of Jerusalem
84*4,5=378***Saturn
780(Mars)/4,5=173,3333333333333
388,8(Jupiter)/4,5=86,4
(378 * 173,3333333333333)/180=364
(375*174,96)/180=364,5(December 31)
(375*175)/180=364,5833333333333(December 31)
(378*174,96)/180=367,416(perihelium ; January 3)
(378*175)/180=367,5(perihelium ; January 3)
367,5(perihelium ; January 3)*1,6=588(synodic period of Venus)
A reference to the Holy Bible: Daniel 12:11,12
360*4,375=1575
360*4,374=1574,64
1575/0,36=4375
1574,64/0,36=4374
4375*2*360=3150000
3150000/8640=364,5833333333333(tropical year)
364,5833333333333(tropical year)*1,6=583,3333333333333(synodic period of Venus)
4374*2*360=3149280
3149280/8640=364,5
364,5*1,6=583,2(synodic period of Venus)
1335(Daniel 12:11,12)/100=13,35
583,929(synodic period of Venus)/13,35=43,74
583,929(synodic period of Venus)/1,6=364,955625
43,74*2=87,48
189*13,35(Daniel 12:11,12)=2523,15
2523,15/7=360,45
360,45*1,62=583,929(synodic period of Venus)
583,929/1,6=364,955625 days
______________________________________________________
Type of product / material:Gorge
The average mass of 1 m3 in kg=615-640
Average volume 1 t in m3=1,63-1,56
Type of product / material:Peas, beans, vetch
The average mass of 1 m3 in kg=800-850
Average volume 1 t in m3=1,25-1,18
Type of product / material:Rape
The average mass of 1 m3 in kg=700-720
Average volume 1 t in m3= 1,43-1,39
The surface of the sphere is the sphere:
ReplyDelete4"ancient pi"*R= 4 * 3,15*6300(radius of the Earth)*6300(radius of the Earth)=500094000
500094000/252000(the circumference of the Earth)=1984,5
______________________________
0,53333333 j.a=80000000 km
80000000 * 0,54=43200000
43200000 *0,9722222222222222=42000000(The distance of Venus from Earth)
350 / 0,9722222222222222=360
(350*360)*2=25200(the circumference of the Earth)/0,9722222222222222
(7*7,2)*2*52,5(royal cubit)=5292
5292*6000=31752000
31752000/360=88200
31752000/86400=367,5 (perihelium)
(...)The historian of science Sarton was struck by the information he found in Lepsius that many Egyptian cubits present sixteen fingers at one end subdivided into fractions of increasing denominator: 1, ½, 1/3, 1/15. He properly concluded that this peculiar subdivision must correspond to a specific practice and asked for an explanation through the pages of the magazine Isis, but received none. It seems to me that the division up to 1/15 of finger in Egypt is the counterpart of the division up to 1/18 in the rule of Gudea. The explanation is that a minute of march was calculated in Egypt as 150 cubits (525 x 150 = 78.75 m.), whereas in Mesopotamia it was calculated as 180 cubits (506.25 x 180 = 91.125 m.).(...)quote from the site
ReplyDeletehttps://www.metrum.org/measures/length_u.htm
[252000(the circumference of the Earth) * 157,5(metr)] / 1000(unit of measure)= 39690 km (the circumference of the Earth)
(785,5*157,5)=124031,25
124031,25/2450=50,625
7*50,625=354,375
7,2*50,625=364,5
364,5/4=91,125
sorry : 364,5/4=91,125
Delete360/4=90
91,125/90=1,0125
(1,0125*100*100)/ 91,125=111,1111111111111 arc seconds
_____________________________________
At the equator, an arc-second of longitude approximately equals an arc-second of latitude, which is 1/60th of a nautical mile (or 101.27 feet or 30.87 meters). Arc-seconds of latitude remain nearly constant, while arc-seconds of longitude decrease in a trigonometric cosine-based fashion as one moves toward the earth's poles. At 49 degrees north latitude, along the northern boundary of the Concrete sheet, an arc-second of longitude equals 30.87 meters * 0,6561 (cos 49°) or 20.250 meters. Ideally, a three arc-second grid cell on the north edge of the Concrete sheet measures 60.75 meters along its north side and 92.60 meters along its east and west sides.
_____________________________________________
Time:367,5 (January 3; peryhelion)
30.87 (days)*12 (month)=370,44 days
370,44(days)/1,008=367,5(January 3 ;perihelion)
92,6*4=370,44 days
(370,44 * 1,6)/600=0,98784
370,44/9,8784=375***Venus as the Evening Star or Morning Star
Autor:Susan Milbrath " The Role of Venus in theCosmologies of Mesoamerica, West Mexico,the American Southwest, and Southeast"
Susan Milbrath quote :(...)From any given spot on the Earth a total solar eclipse will be visible, weather permitting, on average once every 375 years, although given the complex orbital interactions of Earth, Sun and Moon, they can occur in consecutive years or more than 1100 years apart.(...)
Calculated path latitudes are stable through time but our ability to accurately plot the longitude of solar eclipse paths diminishes as we move back in time. Whereas we have total confidence in the calculated path of an 18 th century eclipse, by AD 1400 the uncertainty increases to approximately +/- 0.2° of longitude (~22 km at the equator).
The umbral shadow of a solar eclipse covers only a small swath across the Earth. For a non-polar total eclipse this path will average about 12,000 km in length and 130 km wide, but can range in width from less than a kilometer to around 270 km. During an eclipse at the latitude of Arizona the Moon’s shadow races east along the ground at 30 km or more per minute. The theoretical maximum length of time for totality is 7' 31", averaging around 2-3 minutes. Due to the grazing geometry on the Moon's limb with respect to the Sun, the duration of an eclipse increases dramatically in the first 10 km as one moves from the edges of the path of totality inward to its central line. The Sun is so bright that it is only when an eclipse reaches a magni-tude of 0.94 to 0.95 on a relatively clear day that the effects become pronounced enough for everyone to realize something unusual is happening. Even a distant total eclipse path can have a pronounced visible effect; the total eclipse of August 26, 1318 produced a magnitude of 0.96 at the Hohokam Casa Grande great house community some 136 km from the edge of the path of totality .
see:http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1173474,1175058#msg-1175058
I'm sorry, I do not know English, that's why I use a Google translator. Please read my comments : http://themysteriesofhistory.blogspot.com/2012/06/world-from-barley-seed.html#comment-form
ReplyDeleteand The school of prehistoric precision engineering , Megalithic Europe: Perimetric Measure and Historical Units. My nickname is rodz111 or rodz123 (academia.edu)
Dokładniej co 40,5 roku dodawany był miesiąc interkalacyjny .
40*1,0125=40,5
Ale 40,5 letni okres obserwacji astronomicznych opartych na 2 skrajnych punktach orbity eliptycznej (perihelium i abhelium ) nie wymagał korekty w postaci dodatkowego miesiąca interkalacyjnego.
40,5*367,5(perihelium ; January 3)=14700*1,0125=490*30,375( tropical month)
30,375( tropical month)/7,5 (week)=4,05
490 * 30,375=1984,5*7,5(week)
Natomiast synchronizacja z kalendarzem Juliańskim już wymagała dodanie jednego miesiąca interkalacyjnego:
40,5*365,25(kalendarz Juliański)=487*30,375=486*30,4375
o tym cały czas mówię na forum http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/list.php?1
Translator google:
More specifically, the intercalation month was added every 40.5 years.
40 * 1.0125 = 40.5
But a 40.5 year period of astronomical observations based on 2 extreme points of the elliptical orbit (perihelium and abhelium) did not require an additional correction one month (Adar II).
40.5 * 367.5 (perihelion; January 3) = 14700 * 1.0125 = 490 * 30.375 (tropical month)
30,375 (tropical month) / 7.5 (week) = 4.05
490 * 30,375 = 1984.5 * 7.5 (week)
In contrast, synchronization with the Julian calendar already required the addition of one intercalation month:
40.5 * 365.25 (Julian calendar) = 487 * 30.375 = 486 * 30.4375
I'm talking about it all at http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/list.php?1
245*1,5=367,5(perihelium ;January 3)
244*1,5=366("leap year" requires adding an Adar II) ancient principle : day,year,degree
_______________________________________________________________________
The history of this ancient and modern metrology has the Lord recorded in the Scriptures, but not only that. The order of the following global powers, the economic and political crisis after 1914 and the history of the "depreciation" of gold over 2520 years. Answers to these and other questions are contained in the Book of Daniel. I'm happy to share information. greetings - rodz
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete